the introduction lesson brought up some interesting questions, eg what are the functions of an art historian and a curator, and if they are so similar, why do we separate them?)
personally I think that a curator is a 'promoted' art historian, curator has the base (art historian knowledge and skills) plus he has valuable experience and skills in managing/organising)
we discussed the general things (eg components of exhibitions) we already know, but I am more interested in details and practical approach
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment